Back to search
C

Brand

Charms

37 productsAvg score: 21/100

Blue Razz, Bubble Gum Filled Lollipop, Berry

Fluffy stuff

Fluffy stuff

Sour Balls Candy

Mini Pops

Blow Pop, Bubble Gum Filled Lollipops

Charms, sweet 'n sour pops, assorted

Pops

Assorted bubble gum filled pops

Assorted bubble gum filled pops

Assorted bubble gum filled pops

Blow Pop

Blow Pop Bubble Gum Filled Lollipop

Bubble gum filled lollipop

Bubblegum Filled Pops

Charms, blow pop, assorted bubble gum

Charms, blow pop, assorted bubble gum

Charms, blow pop, assorted bubble gum filled pops

Charms, blow pop, bubble gum filled lollipops

Charms, blow pop, bubble gum filled pops, assorted bubble gum

Charms, blow pop, bubble gum filled pops, cherry

Charms, blow pop, candy, watermelon blue razz cherry sour apple

Charms, blow pop, pop minis, watermelon, blue razz, cherry, sour apple

Charms, blow pop, pop minis, watermelon, blue razz, cherry, sour apple

Fluffy Stuff Cotton Tails Candy

Super blow pop

Super Blow Pop

Super Blow Pop Bubble Gum

Super Blow Pop Candy

Sweet Pops

Sweet Pops

Sweet Pops

Charms, fluffy stuff, cotton candy, pops

Blow pop minis

Charms, minipops - 150 pops

Charms, sweet pops, cherry and blue razz berry

Charms, valentine pops, cherry

Mini Pops

Premium lollipops

About Charms on Looksee

Looksee tracks 37 products from Charms in the catalogue. Across the 37 scored products, the average Looksee Score is 21/100 (Poor).

Score breakdown: Poor (30), Bad (7). Highest-scoring: Blue Razz, Bubble Gum Filled Lollipop, Berry at 33/100. Lowest-scoring: Premium lollipops at 16/100.

Nutri-Score grades in this catalogue: E (32).

Processing level (NOVA classification): Group 4 — Ultra-processed food (37).

Category: food (37).

Every Looksee Score combines three independently validated signals into one 0–100 number, where higher is always better: Nutri-Score (nutrition quality — calories, saturated fat, sugar, and salt weighed against fibre and protein, up to 40 points), NOVA classification (degree of industrial processing, from unprocessed to ultra-processed, up to 35 points), and additive risk (a risk-weighted penalty for ingredients flagged by EFSA or peer-reviewed studies, up to 25 points). If a pillar has no data for a given product, it is dropped from both the numerator and denominator so the product is never penalised for a data gap. See the full scoring methodology →