Brand
Concord Foods
Caramel Apple Kit
Banana smoothie mix oz
Classic guacamole mix
Concord foods, smoothie, tropical mango
Mild guacamole seasoning mix, mild
Orange Smoothie Mix
Smoothie mix
Smoothie mix with flaxseed
Southwest Seasoning Mix
Tropical Pineapple Smoothie Mix
Original Salad Topping
Potato Topping
Asian Style Stir Fry Mix
Concord foods, authentic guacamole mix, lime & cilanto
Ranch Dip Seasoning Mix
Banana Bread Mix
Concord foods, smoothie mix, chocolate banana
Tempura Style Onion Ring Batter
Apple Crisp
Caramel Dip
Chili mix
Concord foods, carrot glaze, original
Concord foods, roasted potato seasoning mix, original
Concord foods, salsa seasoning mix, hot
Concord foods, sweet potato & yam glaze, original
Guacamole Mix, Extra Spicy
Meatball mix
Salsa seasoning mix
Sloppy joe mix
Smoothie Strawberry
Caramel Dip
Fat-Free Caramel Dip
Meatball mix
Pumpkin Spice Caramel Dip
Wripples
Concord foods, mashed potato seasoning mix, roasted garlic & herbs
Concord foods, mushroom batter, tempura style
Fresh Cranberry Bread Mix
Southern-Style Green & Kale Seasoning Mix
Broccoli Soup
Concord foods, hollandaise sauce mix, original
Concord foods, broccoli soup, cheddar cheese
About Concord Foods on Looksee
Looksee tracks 42 products from Concord Foods in the catalogue. Across the 42 scored products, the average Looksee Score is 31/100 (Poor).
Score breakdown: Poor (28), Fair (11), Bad (2), Good (1). Highest-scoring: Caramel Apple Kit at 61/100. Lowest-scoring: Concord foods, broccoli soup, cheddar cheese at 12/100.
Nutri-Score grades in this catalogue: E (24), C (2), A (1), D (1).
Processing level (NOVA classification): Group 4 — Ultra-processed food (42).
Category: food (42).
Every Looksee Score combines three independently validated signals into one 0–100 number, where higher is always better: Nutri-Score (nutrition quality — calories, saturated fat, sugar, and salt weighed against fibre and protein, up to 40 points), NOVA classification (degree of industrial processing, from unprocessed to ultra-processed, up to 35 points), and additive risk (a risk-weighted penalty for ingredients flagged by EFSA or peer-reviewed studies, up to 25 points). If a pillar has no data for a given product, it is dropped from both the numerator and denominator so the product is never penalised for a data gap. See the full scoring methodology →