Back to search
D

Brand

Davinci

25 productsAvg score: 88/100

100% durum wheat semolina

Angel hair 100% durum wheat semolina enriched macaroni product

Davinci penne rigate

Davinci penne rigate

Davinci, elbows

Davinci, linguine, enriched macaroni product

Davinci, manicotti-cannelloni

Davinci, orzo

Davinci, penne pasta

Davinci, twists, enriched macaroni product

Davinci. rigatoni

Elbow macaroni

Enriched macaroni product, premium authentic italian pasta

Fettuccine, Enriched Macaroni Product

Fusilli enriched macaroni product

Rigatoni enriched macaroni product

Rotini

Signature spaghetti

Wagon wheels real italian pasta

Extra Virgin Olive Oil

Olive oil

Premium Extra Virgin Olive Oil

Pesto genovese

Sun Dried Tomato Pesto

Risotto milanese with saffron

Risotto With Four Cheeses

About Davinci on Looksee

Looksee tracks 25 products from Davinci in the catalogue. Across the 25 scored products, the average Looksee Score is 88/100 (Excellent).

Score breakdown: Excellent (18), Good (3), Fair (2), Poor (2). Highest-scoring: 100% durum wheat semolina at 100/100. Lowest-scoring: Risotto With Four Cheeses at 35/100.

Nutri-Score grades in this catalogue: A (18), D (4), B (3).

Processing level (NOVA classification): Group 1 — Unprocessed or minimally processed (18), Group 2 — Processed culinary ingredient (3), Group 3 — Processed food (2), Group 4 — Ultra-processed food (2).

Category: food (25).

Every Looksee Score combines three independently validated signals into one 0–100 number, where higher is always better: Nutri-Score (nutrition quality — calories, saturated fat, sugar, and salt weighed against fibre and protein, up to 40 points), NOVA classification (degree of industrial processing, from unprocessed to ultra-processed, up to 35 points), and additive risk (a risk-weighted penalty for ingredients flagged by EFSA or peer-reviewed studies, up to 25 points). If a pillar has no data for a given product, it is dropped from both the numerator and denominator so the product is never penalised for a data gap. See the full scoring methodology →