Back to search
E

Brand

Eillien's Candies Inc.

30 productsAvg score: 34/100

Eillien’s Naturally Quinoa

Eillien's, Brown Flaxseed

California Almonds

Mixed Nuts

Peanuts

Peanuts

Pumpkin Seed Kernels

Roasted / Unsalted Pepitas

Halloween Yogurt Pretzels

Bbq Peanuts

Veggie Chips

Eillien's, Dark Chocolate Peanuts Clusters

Eillien's, Dark Chocolate Stars

Eillien's, Ivory Bark

English Toffee

Honey Roast Mix

Milk Chocolate Bark

Mini Cups Candy

Pecan Caramel Clusters

Zombie Mix Candy

Eillien's, Sour Gummi Bears

Peanut Butter Crunch Mix

Eillien's, Blueberry Yogurt Pretzels

Christmas Mello Cremes

Eillien's, Christmas Pretzels

Eillien's, Root Beer Barrels

Pretzels

Candy Corn

R&G Yogurt, Pretzels

Eileen's Candies, Ju Ju Pumpkins, Orange Grape

About Eillien's Candies Inc. on Looksee

Looksee tracks 30 products from Eillien's Candies Inc. in the catalogue. Across the 30 scored products, the average Looksee Score is 34/100 (Poor).

Score breakdown: Poor (15), Bad (7), Fair (5), Excellent (3). Highest-scoring: Eillien’s Naturally Quinoa at 100/100. Lowest-scoring: Eileen's Candies, Ju Ju Pumpkins, Orange Grape at 10/100.

Nutri-Score grades in this catalogue: E (19), D (8), A (2), C (1).

Processing level (NOVA classification): Group 4 — Ultra-processed food (21), Group 3 — Processed food (6), Group 1 — Unprocessed or minimally processed (3).

Category: food (30).

Every Looksee Score combines three independently validated signals into one 0–100 number, where higher is always better: Nutri-Score (nutrition quality — calories, saturated fat, sugar, and salt weighed against fibre and protein, up to 40 points), NOVA classification (degree of industrial processing, from unprocessed to ultra-processed, up to 35 points), and additive risk (a risk-weighted penalty for ingredients flagged by EFSA or peer-reviewed studies, up to 25 points). If a pillar has no data for a given product, it is dropped from both the numerator and denominator so the product is never penalised for a data gap. See the full scoring methodology →