Back to search
G

Brand

Golden Boy

25 productsAvg score: 65/100

Golden boy, blanched slivered almonds

Golden boy, dry roasted unsalted almonds

Natural whole almonds

Organic almonds

Organic Walnut Halves & Pieces

Golden boy, pecan halves

Golden boy, pecan halves

Walnut Pieces

Dry Roasted Almonds With Sea Salt

Golden boy, apple rings

Golden boy, medium shredded coconut unsweetened

Roasted Unsalted Whole Cashews

Berries & Cherries

Black Currant Infused Rhubarb

Golden boy, bc currants

Golden boy, deluxe fruit mix

Golden boy, dried pitted california prunes

Golden boy, almonds, cashews & pistachios

Golden boy, organic roasted sea salted whole cashews

Strawberry Infused Rhubarb

Mango Slices

Golden boy, banana chips

Golden boy, milk chocolate, whole almonds

Golden boy, tropical fruit mix

Natural Sliced Almonds

About Golden Boy on Looksee

Looksee tracks 25 products from Golden Boy in the catalogue. Across the 24 scored products, the average Looksee Score is 65/100 (Good).

Score breakdown: Fair (9), Excellent (8), Good (4), Poor (2), Bad (1). Highest-scoring: Golden boy, blanched slivered almonds at 100/100. Lowest-scoring: Golden boy, tropical fruit mix at 16/100.

Nutri-Score grades in this catalogue: C (8), D (7), A (6), E (2), B (1).

Processing level (NOVA classification): Group 3 — Processed food (11), Group 1 — Unprocessed or minimally processed (10), Group 4 — Ultra-processed food (3).

Category: food (25).

Every Looksee Score combines three independently validated signals into one 0–100 number, where higher is always better: Nutri-Score (nutrition quality — calories, saturated fat, sugar, and salt weighed against fibre and protein, up to 40 points), NOVA classification (degree of industrial processing, from unprocessed to ultra-processed, up to 35 points), and additive risk (a risk-weighted penalty for ingredients flagged by EFSA or peer-reviewed studies, up to 25 points). If a pillar has no data for a given product, it is dropped from both the numerator and denominator so the product is never penalised for a data gap. See the full scoring methodology →