Brand
Lunchables
Nachos Grande Cheese Dip & Salsa

Extra Cheesy Pizza
Waffle & Bacon Dippers
Extra Cheesy Pizza Lunch Combinations
Lunch Combinations Snack Duos
Uploaded Bbq Chicken Walking Taco
Lunch Combinations With Smoothie, Chicken Popper Kabobbles
Lunch Combinations, Ham & Cheddar
Lunch Combinations, Turkey & Cheddar Crackers Stackers
Lunchables ham + american cracker stackers
Mini Ritz, Mozzarella & Mini Chips Ahoy!

Turkey & Cheddar
Breakfast Cinnamon Roll Dippers
Breakfast Pancake & Bacon Dippers
Chicken Popper Kabobbles Lunch Combinations
Lunch Combinations, Ham & Cheddar With Crackers

NACHOS
Chicken Sliders Lunch Combinations
Lunch Combinations Turkey & Cheddar
Smores dippers
Turkey & American Cracker Stackers Lunch Combinations

Turkey & American with Capri Sun® Pacific Cooler & Reese's® Peanut Butter Cup

Light Bologna & American Cracker Stackers
Cookie Dunks Lunch Combinations

MOZZARELLA & PEPPERONI PROTEIN PACK
Dirt Cake
About Lunchables on Looksee
Looksee tracks 26 products from Lunchables in the catalogue. Across the 26 scored products, the average Looksee Score is 36/100 (Poor).
Score breakdown: Poor (13), Fair (11), Bad (2). Highest-scoring: Nachos Grande Cheese Dip & Salsa at 57/100. Lowest-scoring: Dirt Cake at 12/100.
Nutri-Score grades in this catalogue: D (7), E (6), C (4), B (1).
Processing level (NOVA classification): Group 4 — Ultra-processed food (24), Group 3 — Processed food (2).
Category: food (26).
Every Looksee Score combines three independently validated signals into one 0–100 number, where higher is always better: Nutri-Score (nutrition quality — calories, saturated fat, sugar, and salt weighed against fibre and protein, up to 40 points), NOVA classification (degree of industrial processing, from unprocessed to ultra-processed, up to 35 points), and additive risk (a risk-weighted penalty for ingredients flagged by EFSA or peer-reviewed studies, up to 25 points). If a pillar has no data for a given product, it is dropped from both the numerator and denominator so the product is never penalised for a data gap. See the full scoring methodology →