Brand
Marie's
RASPBERRY VINAIGRETTE

Dressing dip
Marie's, glaze for strawberry

BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE
Blueberry pomegranate vinaigrette, blueberry pomegranate
Creamy Avocado Poblano Dressing
Marie's, lite creamy ranch dressing & dip
Vinaigrette
Blue cheese yogurt dressing
Blueberries Glaze, Blueberries
Parmesan Caesar Yogurt Dressing
Ranch Yogurt Dressing
Yogurt Dressing
Asiago peppercorn dressing + dip, asiago peppercorn
Bbq Coleslaw Dressing
Blue cheese vinaigrette dressing

Caesar Dressing
Chipotle Coleslaw Dressing

Chunky Blue Cheese Dressing
Creamy dressing + dip

Creamy Ranch Dressing
Mango Chardonnay Vinaigrette

Marie's Coleslaw Dressing
Marie's, cheese dressing, chunky feta cheese
Original Coleslaw Dressing
Poppy Seed Dressing
Ranch dressing + dip
Sesame ginger coleslaw dressing

Sesame Ginger Dressing

SUPER BLUE CHEESE DRESSING

Thousand Island Dressing

White Balsamic Shallot Vinaigrette
Yogurt coleslaw dressing, yogurt coleslaw
Marie's, roasted french onion dip
About Marie's on Looksee
Looksee tracks 34 products from Marie's in the catalogue. Across the 34 scored products, the average Looksee Score is 29/100 (Poor).
Score breakdown: Poor (31), Fair (3). Highest-scoring: RASPBERRY VINAIGRETTE at 45/100. Lowest-scoring: Marie's, roasted french onion dip at 22/100.
Nutri-Score grades in this catalogue: E (21), D (9), C (2).
Processing level (NOVA classification): Group 4 — Ultra-processed food (34).
Category: food (34).
Every Looksee Score combines three independently validated signals into one 0–100 number, where higher is always better: Nutri-Score (nutrition quality — calories, saturated fat, sugar, and salt weighed against fibre and protein, up to 40 points), NOVA classification (degree of industrial processing, from unprocessed to ultra-processed, up to 35 points), and additive risk (a risk-weighted penalty for ingredients flagged by EFSA or peer-reviewed studies, up to 25 points). If a pillar has no data for a given product, it is dropped from both the numerator and denominator so the product is never penalised for a data gap. See the full scoring methodology →