Brand
Market District
Cider
Cooking Sauce
Coffee
Asiago Cheese Ciabatta Croutons
General Tso Sauce
Market district, pumpkin spice pecans, pumpkin spice
Hot Sauce
Market district, cold brew coffee, vanilla
Market district, sparkling juice, apple-cinnamon
Szechuan Sauce

Thai Style Wing Sauce
Hot Sauce
Market district, cocoa truffles, pumpkin spice
Market district, dark chocolate, strawberry champagne
Market district, pretzels, milk chocolate honey graham
Market district, sparkling juice, apple maple
Market district, sparkling soda, blood orange
Market district, sparkling soda, pomogranate
Sparkling Soda, Pomegranate
Market district, wing sauce, honey hot
Pad Thai Cooking Sauce
Market district, biscottini twice-baked cookies, pumpkin pecan
Roman Chocolate Truffle
Cold Brew Coffee Concentrate, Original
Honeycrisp Cider Juice, Apple
About Market District on Looksee
Looksee tracks 25 products from Market District in the catalogue. Across the 23 scored products, the average Looksee Score is 37/100 (Poor).
Score breakdown: Poor (15), Fair (5), Good (2), Excellent (1). Highest-scoring: Cider at 100/100. Lowest-scoring: Roman Chocolate Truffle at 22/100.
Nutri-Score grades in this catalogue: E (13), A (3), C (3), D (3).
Processing level (NOVA classification): Group 4 — Ultra-processed food (20), Group 3 — Processed food (2), Group 1 — Unprocessed or minimally processed (1).
Category: food (25).
Every Looksee Score combines three independently validated signals into one 0–100 number, where higher is always better: Nutri-Score (nutrition quality — calories, saturated fat, sugar, and salt weighed against fibre and protein, up to 40 points), NOVA classification (degree of industrial processing, from unprocessed to ultra-processed, up to 35 points), and additive risk (a risk-weighted penalty for ingredients flagged by EFSA or peer-reviewed studies, up to 25 points). If a pillar has no data for a given product, it is dropped from both the numerator and denominator so the product is never penalised for a data gap. See the full scoring methodology →