Brand
Midwood Brands
Midwood brands, llc, sour marshmallow
Midwood brands, llc, gummy sharks candy
Midwood brands, llc, gummy hearts
Mini Gumball Machine With Gumballs Candy
Mixed Fruit Chews
18 Mini Candy Canes
Lollipop Trees
Midwood brands, swirl lollipops, artificially
Scary Eyeball Gum
Swirl Lollipops
Gumballs
Sour Powder Bubble Gum
Marshmallow Candy Mug
Gumballs
Lollipop Bouquet
14 Heart Lollipops
Assorted Fruitfuls Candy
Marshmallow Chicks And Bunnies
Gumballs
Jelly Beans
Midwood brands, chewy candy, fruities
Midwood brands, giant candy cane, natural peppermint flavor
Mini Candy Canes
Jelly Candy Kabob
Assorted Jelly Beans
Candy Canes
Gummy Eyeballs
Midwood brands, bubble gum-filled candy canes, strawberry, watermelon
Midwood brands, sour powder-filled candy canes, lemon, green apple, cherry, strawberry
Swirl Lollipop
Tongue Coloring Gumballs
Candy Kabob
Midwood brands, flip-flop lollipop candy
Midwood brands, llc, jelly-candy kabob
About Midwood Brands on Looksee
Looksee tracks 34 products from Midwood Brands in the catalogue. Across the 34 scored products, the average Looksee Score is 15/100 (Bad).
Score breakdown: Bad (22), Poor (12). Highest-scoring: Midwood brands, llc, sour marshmallow at 31/100. Lowest-scoring: Midwood brands, llc, jelly-candy kabob at 5/100.
Nutri-Score grades in this catalogue: E (29), D (3).
Processing level (NOVA classification): Group 4 — Ultra-processed food (34).
Category: food (34).
Every Looksee Score combines three independently validated signals into one 0–100 number, where higher is always better: Nutri-Score (nutrition quality — calories, saturated fat, sugar, and salt weighed against fibre and protein, up to 40 points), NOVA classification (degree of industrial processing, from unprocessed to ultra-processed, up to 35 points), and additive risk (a risk-weighted penalty for ingredients flagged by EFSA or peer-reviewed studies, up to 25 points). If a pillar has no data for a given product, it is dropped from both the numerator and denominator so the product is never penalised for a data gap. See the full scoring methodology →