Brand
Prince
Acini Di Pepe
Alphabets Pasta
Angel Hair
Bow Ties
Cavatappi
Ditalini
Edward Medley
Elbow Macaroni
Enriched Macaroni Large Shells
Fettuccine

Jumbo Shells
Large Elbows
Lasagna
Linguine
Manicotti
Medium Shells
Mostaccioli
Mostaccioli Rigati
Orzo
Oven Ready Lasagna
Pastina
Penne Rigate
Quick Cook Elbow
Quick Cook Penne Rigate
Quick Cook Rotini

Rigatoni
Rotini
Small Rigatoni
Small Shells
Spaghetti
Thin Spaghetti
Tricolor Penne
Tricolor Rotini
Tubettini
Vermicelli
Ziti
Ziti Rigati
Green tea
Of Peace, Green Tea, 100% Organic
Organic white tea
Prince of peace, 100% organic white tea
Prince of peace, organic green tea
Wheels
Natural ginger chews
Prince of peace, instant tea, ginger, honey crystals & plum

Prince Biscuit Goût Chocolat blé complet
Of Peace, All Natural Herbal Extract Tea Dietary Supplement
About Prince on Looksee
Looksee tracks 47 products from Prince in the catalogue. Across the 46 scored products, the average Looksee Score is 94/100 (Excellent).
Score breakdown: Excellent (42), Fair (2), Good (1), Poor (1). Highest-scoring: Acini Di Pepe at 100/100. Lowest-scoring: Prince Biscuit Goût Chocolat blé complet at 25/100.
Nutri-Score grades in this catalogue: A (37), B (5), D (1), E (1).
Processing level (NOVA classification): Group 1 — Unprocessed or minimally processed (42), Group 3 — Processed food (2), Group 4 — Ultra-processed food (2).
Category: food (47).
Every Looksee Score combines three independently validated signals into one 0–100 number, where higher is always better: Nutri-Score (nutrition quality — calories, saturated fat, sugar, and salt weighed against fibre and protein, up to 40 points), NOVA classification (degree of industrial processing, from unprocessed to ultra-processed, up to 35 points), and additive risk (a risk-weighted penalty for ingredients flagged by EFSA or peer-reviewed studies, up to 25 points). If a pillar has no data for a given product, it is dropped from both the numerator and denominator so the product is never penalised for a data gap. See the full scoring methodology →