Brand
Ritter Sport
Crescent Cookie, Vanilla
Dark Chocolate with Whole Hazelnuts
Rum Trauben Nuss, Milk Chocolate Wih Rum Raisins & Nuts
Ritter sport, fine milk chocolate
White Chocolate With Whole Hazelnuts
Alpine Milk Chocolate
Dark Chocolate
Dark Chocolate
Dark Chocolate with Marzipan Filling
Dark Chocolate With Whole Hazelnuts
European Milk Chocolate With Whole Almonds
Himbeer Vanille Ritter Sport
Knusperflakes Mit Knusprigen Cornflakes
Milk Chocolate with Butter Biscuit
Milk Chocolate With Caramelized Almonds
Milk Chocolate With Cocoa Mousse
Milk Chocolate With Cornflakes
Milk Chocolate With Strawberry Creme
Milk Chocolate with Whole Hazelnuts
Milk Chocolate With Whole Hazelnuts
Mini Mix Fine Quality European Chcoclate
Ritter sport, coffee-vanilla creme chocolate
Ritter sport, milk chocolate filled with yogurt & blackberry creme
Ritter sport, milk chocolate, vanilla chai latte
Rum Raisins Hazelnuts
Strawberry Mint
Winter Edition Milk Chocolate
About Ritter Sport on Looksee
Looksee tracks 27 products from Ritter Sport in the catalogue. Across the 27 scored products, the average Looksee Score is 28/100 (Poor).
Score breakdown: Poor (24), Fair (3). Highest-scoring: Crescent Cookie, Vanilla at 42/100. Lowest-scoring: Winter Edition Milk Chocolate at 25/100.
Nutri-Score grades in this catalogue: E (22), D (2).
Processing level (NOVA classification): Group 4 — Ultra-processed food (27).
Category: food (27).
Every Looksee Score combines three independently validated signals into one 0–100 number, where higher is always better: Nutri-Score (nutrition quality — calories, saturated fat, sugar, and salt weighed against fibre and protein, up to 40 points), NOVA classification (degree of industrial processing, from unprocessed to ultra-processed, up to 35 points), and additive risk (a risk-weighted penalty for ingredients flagged by EFSA or peer-reviewed studies, up to 25 points). If a pillar has no data for a given product, it is dropped from both the numerator and denominator so the product is never penalised for a data gap. See the full scoring methodology →