Brand
Sanpellegrino

Eau Gaz sa Pellegrino 25 cl

Sparkling Natural Mineral Water
Sparkling Natural Mineral Water
Aranciata Rossa Sparkling Blood Orange Beverage
Aranciata Sparkling Beverage
Sparkling Grapefruit Beverage
Sparkling Lemon Beverage With Juice From Concentrate
Italian Sparkling Grapefruit
Naturally Flavored Sparkling Orange Beverage With 19% Orange Juice From Concentrate
5% Orange Juice And 2% Clementine Juice From Concentrate
An italian tradition sparkling clementina beverage
Italian sparkling beverage
Italian Sparkling Grapefruit Beverage From Concentrate
Italian sparkling lemon beverage from concentrate
Italian sparkling orange beverage from concentrate
Italian Sparkling Prickly Pear & Orange Beverage
Sparkling prickly pear & orange beverage with 10% orange juice and 6% prickly pear juice from concentrate, prickly pear & orange
Sparkling water melograno ara of size
About Sanpellegrino on Looksee
Looksee tracks 18 products from Sanpellegrino in the catalogue. Across the 18 scored products, the average Looksee Score is 49/100 (Fair).
Score breakdown: Poor (9), Good (4), Excellent (3), Fair (2). Highest-scoring: Eau Gaz sa Pellegrino 25 cl at 100/100. Lowest-scoring: Sparkling water melograno ara of size at 25/100.
Nutri-Score grades in this catalogue: E (9), A (7), B (1).
Processing level (NOVA classification): Group 4 — Ultra-processed food (15), Group 1 — Unprocessed or minimally processed (3).
Category: food (18).
Every Looksee Score combines three independently validated signals into one 0–100 number, where higher is always better: Nutri-Score (nutrition quality — calories, saturated fat, sugar, and salt weighed against fibre and protein, up to 40 points), NOVA classification (degree of industrial processing, from unprocessed to ultra-processed, up to 35 points), and additive risk (a risk-weighted penalty for ingredients flagged by EFSA or peer-reviewed studies, up to 25 points). If a pillar has no data for a given product, it is dropped from both the numerator and denominator so the product is never penalised for a data gap. See the full scoring methodology →