Brand
Spangler Candy Company
Spangler, Circus Peanuts Marshmallow, Candy Corn
Candy Canes
Candy Canes
Candy Canes
Spangler
Cotton Candy
Dum-Dums, Lollipops, Original
Pinks, blues, reds pops
Summertime Favorites Pops
Candy Cans
Dum-Dums, Candy Canes, Blu Raspberry Cherry Watermelon
Heart Pops
Holiday pops
Marshmallow bunnies chicks & eggs candy, marshmallow
Peach-mango, blueberry burst, strawberry-kiwi, pineapple-coconut, tropical freeze, dragon fruit, berry lemonade, lemon-lime pops, peach-mango, blueberry burst, strawberry-kiwi, pineapple-coconut, tropical freeze, dragon fruit, berry lemonade, lemon-lime
Marshmallow circus peanuts candy, marshmallow
Original Pops
Dum Dums, Gummies
Dum
Dum
Dum
Dum Dums, Dum.Dums Original Pops
Dum-Dums, Original Pops
DumDums Original pops
Original Pops
Original Pops
Original Pops
Original Pops
Original Pops
Original Pops
Original Pops
Original Pops, Mystery Flavor
Originalpops
Valentine lollipop bouquets
Gummy Snaks
About Spangler Candy Company on Looksee
Looksee tracks 35 products from Spangler Candy Company in the catalogue. Across the 35 scored products, the average Looksee Score is 16/100 (Bad).
Score breakdown: Bad (26), Poor (9). Highest-scoring: Spangler, Circus Peanuts Marshmallow, Candy Corn at 30/100. Lowest-scoring: Gummy Snaks at 8/100.
Nutri-Score grades in this catalogue: E (31).
Processing level (NOVA classification): Group 4 — Ultra-processed food (35).
Category: food (35).
Every Looksee Score combines three independently validated signals into one 0–100 number, where higher is always better: Nutri-Score (nutrition quality — calories, saturated fat, sugar, and salt weighed against fibre and protein, up to 40 points), NOVA classification (degree of industrial processing, from unprocessed to ultra-processed, up to 35 points), and additive risk (a risk-weighted penalty for ingredients flagged by EFSA or peer-reviewed studies, up to 25 points). If a pillar has no data for a given product, it is dropped from both the numerator and denominator so the product is never penalised for a data gap. See the full scoring methodology →