Back to search
S

Brand

Sweet Smiles

38 productsAvg score: 17/100

Bon Bons Candy, Strawberry

Sweet smiles, gummies, strawberries

Cherry Sours

Chocolate Peanut Clusters

Licorice Allsorts

Peanut Butter Cups

Atomic Fireballs

Cherry Sours

Orange Slices

Red Fish

Sweet smiles, gummi rings, watermelon

Gummi Peach Rings

Orange Slices

Starlight Mints

Sweet smiles, atomic fire ball, candy

Fat Free Root Beer Barrels Candy

Fruit Slices Candy

Mini Fruit Sours

Sweet smiles, bon bons candy, strawberry artificially flavored

Sweet smiles, cinnamon discs candy

Assorted Fruit Discs

Butterscotch discs

Candy Sour Budz

Spice Drops Candy

Sweet smiles, sour buddies candy

Assorted fruit discs

Jelly Beans

Sour fruit slices

Sour Neon Warms

Sweet smiles, sour neon gummi bears

Sweet smiles, spice drops

Bridge Mix

Chocolate Covered Almonds

Chocolate Covered Peanuts

Chocolate Covered Raisins

Circus peanuts

Pecan Caramel Clusters

Yogurt Covered Pretzels

About Sweet Smiles on Looksee

Looksee tracks 38 products from Sweet Smiles in the catalogue. Across the 31 scored products, the average Looksee Score is 17/100 (Bad).

Score breakdown: Bad (20), Poor (11). Highest-scoring: Bon Bons Candy, Strawberry at 27/100. Lowest-scoring: Sweet smiles, spice drops at 8/100.

Nutri-Score grades in this catalogue: E (36), D (1).

Processing level (NOVA classification): Group 4 — Ultra-processed food (38).

Category: food (38).

Every Looksee Score combines three independently validated signals into one 0–100 number, where higher is always better: Nutri-Score (nutrition quality — calories, saturated fat, sugar, and salt weighed against fibre and protein, up to 40 points), NOVA classification (degree of industrial processing, from unprocessed to ultra-processed, up to 35 points), and additive risk (a risk-weighted penalty for ingredients flagged by EFSA or peer-reviewed studies, up to 25 points). If a pillar has no data for a given product, it is dropped from both the numerator and denominator so the product is never penalised for a data gap. See the full scoring methodology →