Brand
Tic Tac
Freshmints
Limited edition despicible me minion bundle
Tic tac fruit adventure mint
Strawberry fields
Tic tac, flavored mints, strawberry
Tic tac, flavored mints, grape
Tic tac, mints, grape
Tic tac, snowman fruit mix mints, lime & berry, lime & berry
Freshmints
Freshmints
Freshmints
Freshmints
Freshmints
Fruit Mints
Mixers Mints, Peach, Lemonade
Tic tac, flavored mints, berry cherry
Tic tac, flavored mints, orange
Tic tac, flavored mints, orange
Tic tac, mixers mints, cherry cola
Tic tac, mummy mints, orange
Candy cane
Tic tac, flavored mints, grrr...een apple
Tic tac, flavored mints, wintergreen
Tic tac, flavored mints, wintergreen
Tic tac, scary sweets mints, grape & cherry
Flavored Mints
Flavored Mints, Grape
Mints
Mints, Candy Cane
Minions Mints, Banana
Flavored Mints, Berry Cherry
Flavored Mints, Orange
Mints
Tic Tac Orange
Tic Tac Orange
Candy Cane
Mints, Orange, Fruit Adventure, Wintergreen
Tic tac wintergreen packs
WINTERGREEN
Tic tac, flavored mints, fruit adventure
Tic tac, flavored mints, fruit adventure
Flavored Mints, Spearmint Mix
Mints
Freshmints
Sugar free gum
Flavored Mints, Fruit Adventure
Fruit Adventure
Fruit Adventure Mints
About Tic Tac on Looksee
Looksee tracks 48 products from Tic Tac in the catalogue. Across the 48 scored products, the average Looksee Score is 38/100 (Poor).
Score breakdown: Fair (24), Poor (23), Good (1). Highest-scoring: Freshmints at 65/100. Lowest-scoring: Fruit Adventure Mints at 20/100.
Nutri-Score grades in this catalogue: C (18), A (3), E (1).
Processing level (NOVA classification): Group 4 — Ultra-processed food (48).
Category: food (48).
Every Looksee Score combines three independently validated signals into one 0–100 number, where higher is always better: Nutri-Score (nutrition quality — calories, saturated fat, sugar, and salt weighed against fibre and protein, up to 40 points), NOVA classification (degree of industrial processing, from unprocessed to ultra-processed, up to 35 points), and additive risk (a risk-weighted penalty for ingredients flagged by EFSA or peer-reviewed studies, up to 25 points). If a pillar has no data for a given product, it is dropped from both the numerator and denominator so the product is never penalised for a data gap. See the full scoring methodology →