Brand
Tom's
Hot Fries Corn And Potato Snack
Crispy ridges potato chips
Orginal potato chips
Original Potato Chips
Potato Chips
Vinegar & Salt Potato chips
Potato chips
Bugles
Bugles bugles
Fried Pork Skins
Original Cracklins
Pork Cracklin Strips
Pork Skins
Potato chips
Potato Chips
Potato Chips
Potato Chips
Hot Fries, Corn Potato Snack
Tom’s Bacon Cheddar Fries
Bar-B-Q Potato Chips
Corn Snacks
Fried pork skins vinegar & salt
Pork Skins Chicharrones
Potato chips
Potato Chips, Vinegar & Salt
Tom's, potato chips, dill pickle, dill pickle
Pork Skins
Tom's, mega cracklins, fried out pork fat with attached skin, southern style hot sauce, southern style hot sauce
Tom's, ridges potato chips, mesquite bbq, mesquite bbq
ToMS fRieD POrK SKinS
Nacho cheese tortilla chips
Tom's, tortilla chips, nacho cheese, nacho cheese
Potato chips
Tom's, potato chips, spicy mustard, spicy mustard
Pork Skins Hot Flavored Chicharrones
Tom's, corn snacks, cheese puffs, cheese puffs
Ranch Bugles
Tom’s Nacho Rings
Tom's, bugels, flavored corn snacks, nacho cheese, nacho cheese
About Tom's on Looksee
Looksee tracks 39 products from Tom's in the catalogue. Across the 39 scored products, the average Looksee Score is 30/100 (Poor).
Score breakdown: Poor (27), Bad (6), Fair (5), Good (1). Highest-scoring: Hot Fries Corn And Potato Snack at 63/100. Lowest-scoring: Tom's, bugels, flavored corn snacks, nacho cheese, nacho cheese at 12/100.
Nutri-Score grades in this catalogue: E (23), D (12), A (1), C (1).
Processing level (NOVA classification): Group 4 — Ultra-processed food (29), Group 3 — Processed food (10).
Category: food (39).
Every Looksee Score combines three independently validated signals into one 0–100 number, where higher is always better: Nutri-Score (nutrition quality — calories, saturated fat, sugar, and salt weighed against fibre and protein, up to 40 points), NOVA classification (degree of industrial processing, from unprocessed to ultra-processed, up to 35 points), and additive risk (a risk-weighted penalty for ingredients flagged by EFSA or peer-reviewed studies, up to 25 points). If a pillar has no data for a given product, it is dropped from both the numerator and denominator so the product is never penalised for a data gap. See the full scoring methodology →