Brand
Progresso
BREAD CRUMBS PLAIN
Garden Vegetable
Southwest-Style Black Bean
Steakhouse-Style Steak & Bean Soup
Beef Barley
Chicken Broth Reduced Sodium
CHICKPEA & NOODLE
Creamy Chicken & Homestyle Noodles
Creamy tomato soup with basil
Hearty Chicken & Rotini
Hearty Grain Vegetable Soup
Italian-Style Wedding
Lentil with Roasted Vegetables
Light southwestern style vegetable soup
Mediterranean-Style Lentil
Progresso Vegetable Classics Hearty Tomato Soup
Savory Beef Barley Vegetable
Slow Cooked Vegetable Beef
VEGETABLE
Zesty Santa Fe Style Chicken Soup
Green split pea
Traditional Split Pea with Ham Soup
Beef Pot Roast with Country Vegetables
Bread Crumbs - Italian Style
Cheese Tortellini in Garden Vegetable Tomato Soup
Chicken & Dumpling Soup
Chicken & Sausage Gumbo
Chicken & Wild Rice Soup
Chicken Broth Classic
Chicken Noodle
Chicken Tortilla Soup
Lasagna-Style Soup with Italian Sausage
Lentil Soup
Minestrone
New England Clam Chowder
Southwest Style Black Bean & Vegetable
TOMATO BASIL
Traditional
Traditional
Chicken & Herb Dumplings
Light Chicken Noodle
Progresso Light Savory Vegetable Barley Soup
Roasted Chicken Noodle
Savory Chicken & Wild Rice
Chicken Corn Chowder
CHICKEN & HOMESTYLE NOODLES
CHICKEN RICE with VEGETABLES
About Progresso on Looksee
Looksee tracks 47 products from Progresso in the catalogue. Across the 47 scored products, the average Looksee Score is 49/100 (Fair).
Score breakdown: Fair (41), Good (4), Poor (2). Highest-scoring: BREAD CRUMBS PLAIN at 67/100. Lowest-scoring: CHICKEN RICE with VEGETABLES at 25/100.
Nutri-Score grades in this catalogue: B (19), C (18), A (3), E (2).
Processing level (NOVA classification): Group 4 — Ultra-processed food (46), Group 3 — Processed food (1).
Category: food (47).
Every Looksee Score combines three independently validated signals into one 0–100 number, where higher is always better: Nutri-Score (nutrition quality — calories, saturated fat, sugar, and salt weighed against fibre and protein, up to 40 points), NOVA classification (degree of industrial processing, from unprocessed to ultra-processed, up to 35 points), and additive risk (a risk-weighted penalty for ingredients flagged by EFSA or peer-reviewed studies, up to 25 points). If a pillar has no data for a given product, it is dropped from both the numerator and denominator so the product is never penalised for a data gap. See the full scoring methodology →